You are here:

Fingerprints

Name: Fingerprints
Director: Harry Basil
Released: 2006
Duration: 95 min

2006

Director

Harry Basil

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Fresh out of rehab, a young woman moves back in with her parents and sister, and soon becomes involved in a mystery that has left people in her town paralyzed.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.4/10

Limited

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of non-heteronormative identities. The narrative centers on a traditional familial structure without exploring queer perspectives.

Gender Representation

Fair

A female protagonist drives the mystery, providing a female-led plot. However, the story relies on traditional domestic frameworks and parental units.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The setting suggests a homogeneous demographic typical of mid-2000s thrillers. There is no indication of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The plot focuses on Western family structures and the domestic sphere. It does not explicitly challenge or critique Western social institutions.

Disability Representation

Limited

The protagonist's history with rehab introduces themes of recovery. However, this struggle seems to serve the mystery rather than exploring mental health with nuance.

Strengths

The film features a female protagonist at the center of the narrative.
The inclusion of a character in recovery introduces themes of mental health and rehabilitation.

Areas for Improvement

The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative narratives.
The cast appears demographically homogeneous, lacking racial and ethnic diversity.
The story relies on traditional Western social and familial structures without critique.

AI Analysis

Fingerprints operates as a conventional genre thriller that adheres to established tropes rather than challenging social hierarchies. While the film provides a female-driven narrative, it remains anchored in traditional domestic and familial structures. The representation of disability is limited to a character's recovery from rehab, which functions primarily as a plot catalyst. There is no evidence of a deeper, nuanced exploration of neurodivergence or chronic illness. Ultimately, the film lacks intentionality regarding intersectional perspectives. It follows a standard mystery framework that avoids deconstructing systemic power dynamics or presenting a diverse cast.

How are these scores produced? →