You are here:

Big Eyes

Big Eyes

Representation Score

6.3/10

Good

2014

PG-13

Director

Tim Burton

Runtime

106 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Big Eyes is a powerful exploration of gendered ability to act and the reclaiming of identity. It transforms a domestic drama into a sophisticated critique of how patriarchal structures commodify female creativity. However, the film's impact is limited by its narrow demographic focus. Set in a culturally homogenous environment, the narrative lacks representation for LGBTQ+ individuals or people with disabilities. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its subversion of mid-century social norms, even if it remains confined to a specific racial and social milieu.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Big Eyes have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not feature any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It focuses solely on a heterosexual marriage and its internal power dynamics.

How does Big Eyes portray gender?

Excellent

Margaret Keane’s journey from a suppressed wife to an autonomous artist challenges traditional patriarchal hierarchies. The film dismantles the submissive female archetype by revealing the male protagonist's deceptive authority.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Big Eyes?

Fair

Set in a predominantly white mid-century American context, the film reflects the era's lack of racial diversity. It focuses on gender and class rather than multi-layered racial dynamics.

How does Big Eyes represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The narrative critiques capitalist exploitation and the corruption of Western commercial art markets. It examines how marriage and legal systems can be used to silence underrepresented voices.

Does Big Eyes include disability representation?

Fair

There are no prominent depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. While the film explores psychological themes like gaslighting, these do not fall under disability representation.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional gender hierarchies through Margaret Keane's reclamation of her intellectual property.
  • Offers a nuanced critique of capitalist exploitation within the Western art market.
  • Dismantles the 'submissive wife' archetype by portraying the male lead as a deceptive figure.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight-centered narratives.
  • Reflects a lack of racial and ethnic diversity inherent to its mid-century setting.
  • Does not include depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

In the late 1950s and early '60s, artist Walter Keane achieves unbelievable fame and success with portraits of saucer-eyed waifs. However, no one realizes that his wife, Margaret, is the real painter behind the brush. Although Margaret is horrified to learn that Walter is passing off her work as his own, she is too meek to protest too loudly. It isn't until the Keanes' marriage comes to an end and a lawsuit follows that the truth finally comes to light.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.