You are here:

Jack the Ripper : The Case Reopened

Name: Jack the Ripper : The Case Reopened
Director: Ashley Gething
Released: 2019
Duration: 59 min

Representation Score

3.3/10

Limited

2019

Director

Ashley Gething

Runtime

59 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This documentary prioritizes historical inquiry and forensic reconstruction over social commentary. It uses modern technology to re-examine the Jack the Ripper case through a technical, criminological lens. The production succeeds in diversifying the investigative voice by placing a woman in a position of authority. However, the content remains largely tethered to a conventional Western historical narrative. Overall, the film lacks engagement with the overlapping aspects of identity, focusing instead on the systemic processes of British law enforcement and academic rigor.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Jack the Ripper : The Case Reopened have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The documentary focuses solely on the forensic details of the Victorian-era murders and does not include any LGBTQ+ themes or non-cisgender identities.

How does Jack the Ripper : The Case Reopened portray gender?

Fair

Emilia Fox plays a central, authoritative role alongside a leading academic. The narrative also centers on female experiences by suggesting a woman may have been the first victim.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Jack the Ripper : The Case Reopened?

Limited

The investigation remains centered on the Whitechapel district, with no indication of a diverse cast or the integration of non-Anglo-Saxon perspectives.

How does Jack the Ripper : The Case Reopened represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film operates within a traditional Western institutional framework, prioritizing British law enforcement methodologies and empirical evidence over diverse cultural or subjective narratives.

Does Jack the Ripper : The Case Reopened include disability representation?

Minimal

The documentary provides no discernible evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within its investigative framework.

Present on Screen

The documentary places Emilia Fox in an authoritative investigative role, disrupting traditional gender hierarchies.
The narrative shifts focus toward female experiences by re-evaluating the identity of the initial victim.

Limited or Absent

The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer-themed narratives.
There is a lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast and the historical perspectives presented.
The work does not address disability representation or neurodivergent perspectives.

Official Synopsis

Emilia Fox and Britain’s top criminologist, Professor David Wilson, cast new light on the Jack the Ripper case. Together, they examine the Ripper’s modus operandi using modern technology to recreate the murder sites to help understand the extraordinary risks the Ripper took to kill his victims. Using the Home Office Large Major Enquiry System (HOLMES)—a bespoke computer system used by the police to help detect patterns in criminal activity—and evidence uncovered within the investigation, results strongly indicate another woman was, in fact, the first Ripper victim.

How are these scores produced? →