You are here:
Jack the Ripper: The Case Reopened

Jack the Ripper: The Case Reopened

2019

Director

Ashley Gething

Runtime

59 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Emilia Fox and Britain’s top criminologist, Professor David Wilson, cast new light on the Jack the Ripper case. Together, they examine the Ripper’s modus operandi using modern technology to recreate the murder sites to help understand the extraordinary risks the Ripper took to kill his victims. Using the Home Office Large Major Enquiry System (HOLMES)—a bespoke computer system used by the police to help detect patterns in criminal activity—and evidence uncovered within the investigation, results strongly indicate another woman was, in fact, the first Ripper victim.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.6/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The documentary focuses strictly on the forensic details of the Victorian-era murders. There are no queer themes or non-cisnormative identities present in the investigation.

Gender Representation

Fair

Emilia Fox holds a central, authoritative role alongside a leading academic. The narrative also centers female experiences by suggesting a woman may have been the first victim.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The investigation remains centered on the Whitechapel district. There is no indication of a diverse cast or the integration of non-Anglo-Saxon perspectives.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film operates within a traditional Western institutional framework. It prioritizes British law enforcement methodologies and empirical evidence over diverse cultural or subjective narratives.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The documentary provides no discernible evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within its investigative framework.

Strengths

  • The documentary disrupts traditional gender hierarchies by centering Emilia Fox in an authoritative investigative role.
  • The narrative shifts focus toward female experiences by re-evaluating the identity of the initial victim.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer-themed narratives.
  • There is a lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast and the historical perspectives presented.
  • The work does not address disability representation or neurodivergent perspectives.

AI Analysis

This documentary prioritizes historical inquiry and forensic reconstruction over social commentary. It uses modern technology to re-examine the Jack the Ripper case through a technical, criminological lens. The production succeeds in diversifying the investigative voice by placing a woman in a position of authority. However, the content remains largely tethered to a conventional Western historical narrative. Overall, the film lacks engagement with intersectional identities, focusing instead on the systemic processes of British law enforcement and academic rigor.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.