You are here:

Honey, I Blew Up the Kid

Honey, I Blew Up the Kid

Representation Score

1.6/10

Minimal

1992

PG

Director

Randal Kleiser

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Honey, I Blew Up the Kid is a classic early-90s family comedy that adheres to traditional demographic norms. The story relies on well-known comedic clichés and a homogeneous social environment, offering little disruption to existing social structures. The film centers on the nuclear family and uses science fiction for spectacle rather than exploring diverse lived experiences or challenging existing social hierarchies.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Honey, I Blew Up the Kid have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or explore non-straight relationships. It focuses solely on heterosexual relationships within the family.

How does Honey, I Blew Up the Kid portray gender?

Limited

Gender roles adhere to traditional domestic stereotypes. The male lead is portrayed as a bumbling scientist, while the female characters provide stability and support for the family.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Honey, I Blew Up the Kid?

Minimal

The cast is predominantly white, reflecting the era's typical casting practices. The Las Vegas setting offers visual excitement but lacks ethnic or racial diversity.

How does Honey, I Blew Up the Kid represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story emphasizes Western social structures by centering on the stability of the nuclear family. It avoids criticizing institutions and focuses on maintaining family harmony.

Does Honey, I Blew Up the Kid include disability representation?

Minimal

The child's physical transformation is used as a science-fiction plot device rather than representing actual disabilities. There are no characters with real disabilities or neurodivergence.

Present on Screen

  • The film presents a clear, cohesive narrative focused on family responsibility and domestic stakes.

Limited or Absent

  • The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, presenting a very homogeneous social environment.
  • Gender roles rely on traditional stereotypes rather than challenging established hierarchies.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or characters.
  • The film lacks meaningful representation of actual disabilities or neurodivergence.

Official Synopsis

Wayne Szalinski is at it again. But instead of shrinking things, he tries to make a machine that can make things grow. As in the first one, his machine isn't quite accurate. But when he brings Nick & his toddler son Adam to see his invention, the machine unexpectedly starts working. And when Adam comes right up to the machine, he gets zapped along with his stuffed bunny.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.