You are here:

Pet Fooled

Name: Pet Fooled
Director: Kohl Harrington
Released: 2016
Duration: 70 min

Representation Score

1.8/10

Minimal

2016

TV-PG

Director

Kohl Harrington

Runtime

70 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Pet Fooled serves as a specialized investigative exposé rather than a vehicle for multi-layered identity representation. Its strength lies in its institutional critique of the commercial pet food industry. The film challenges the status quo by questioning the transparency and ethics of large-scale corporate structures. Since the documentary is focused on industry investigation, it lacks the complex, character-driven the way different parts of someone's identity overlap found in narrative cinema. The narrative structure is designed to disrupt conventional trust in industrial institutions rather than explore demographic diversity. Ultimately, the film provides a moderate level of progressive engagement by focusing on systemic accountability and the deconstruction of capitalist hierarchies within the domestic consumer market.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Pet Fooled have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The documentary focuses on industrial food production rather than character-driven narratives. There is no exploration of LGBTQ+ identities or non-traditional gender roles.

How does Pet Fooled portray gender?

Fair

The film centers on corporate and industrial processes. It does not explicitly address gender hierarchies or traditional notions of masculinity and femininity.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Pet Fooled?

Minimal

The subject matter is industry-centric rather than identity-centric. There is no information about the racial makeup of the cast or interviewees.

How does Pet Fooled represent religion and culture?

Good

The narrative critiques traditional Western commercial institutions. It highlights skepticism towards established corporate power and capitalist norms by emphasizing transparency.

Does Pet Fooled include disability representation?

Minimal

No specific data is available regarding the inclusion of neurodivergent individuals or those with physical disabilities within the film.

Present on Screen

The film offers a strong systemic critique of established corporate power and capitalist norms.
It provides a progressive lens by challenging the lack of transparency in the pet food industry.

Limited or Absent

The documentary lacks character-driven the way different parts of someone's identity overlap and diverse identity representation.
There is no evidence of meaningful engagement with LGBTQ+, racial, or disability-focused narratives.

Official Synopsis

An investigative expose of the inner workings inside the commercial pet food industry, which has gone largely unchallenged until now.

How are these scores produced? →