You are here:
Cyst

Cyst

2020

NR

Director

Tyler Russell

Runtime

68 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In the 1960s, a nurse's last day on her job is ruined when a doctor inadvertently creates a cyst monster that terrorizes the office.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.6/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ character arcs or non-heteronormative identities. The plot focuses primarily on the conflict between medical staff and a biological anomaly.

Gender Representation

Fair

A female nurse serves as the protagonist, navigating power dynamics against a male doctor. This setup allows for a critique of male authority within a medical hierarchy.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The ensemble features a multi-ethnic cast, including performers like Darren Ewing and Torren Davis. However, the 1960s setting may impact how these identities are integrated.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative critiques institutional competence by framing the medical establishment as a source of chaos. It views traditional scientific authority with skepticism.

Disability Representation

Fair

The cyst monster represents a biological abnormality and bodily deviation. The film explores the 'othering' of non-standard physical forms through this sci-fi construct.

Strengths

  • Features a multi-ethnic ensemble cast including Torren Davis and Darren Ewing.
  • Provides a foundation for exploring gendered power dynamics through a female protagonist.
  • Uses the mad doctor trope to critique institutional stability and scientific ethics.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks visible LGBTQ+ representation or non-heteronormative character arcs.
  • Risk of using the biological anomaly as a plot device rather than a character.
  • Uncertainty regarding the agency of diverse cast members within the 1960s setting.

AI Analysis

Cyst functions as a genre-bending homage to mid-century schlock cinema, utilizing a 1960s setting to explore medical malpractice. The film's strength lies in its potential to subvert traditional authority through its 'mad doctor' trope and its diverse ensemble cast. However, the film lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities and relies on a creature that may serve as a mere plot device rather than a character with agency. The degree of character agency for non-white cast members remains unclear due to the period setting.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.