New Showbiz

You are here:
And Yet We Were All Blind

And Yet We Were All Blind

2023

Director

Beatrice Pollet

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Who has never heard of pregnancy denial? This condition, often caused by miscellaneous circumstances, escapes our understanding and even science. How can the mind of a pregnant woman hide a child growing in her body?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.8/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender depictions. However, its focus on subverting biological certainty creates a conceptual space that aligns with queer explorations of bodily identity.

Gender Representation

Good

The narrative centers on the female experience and the cognitive dissonance of pregnancy. It disrupts patriarchal medical narratives by presenting a destabilizing portrayal of womanhood and biological agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast features a multi-ethnic European ensemble, including Maud Wyler and Géraldine Nakache. It is unclear if race serves as a central narrative driver or a color-blind casting choice.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film challenges Western institutions by framing biological processes through the lens of denial. It deconstructs empirical certainty and questions established medical and social systemic truths.

Disability Representation

Fair

The story explores a profound neuro-psychological condition. It provides a platform for examining invisible neurodivergence and the agency of individuals navigating non-normative cognitive states.

Strengths

  • Centering a complex, non-traditional human experience that challenges scientific and social frameworks.
  • Subverting traditional patriarchal narratives regarding female biological reliability and agency.
  • Exploring invisible neurodivergence through a psychological thriller lens without relying on inspiration porn.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit evidence regarding LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender depictions.
  • Insufficient detail to determine if racial diversity is a central narrative driver or merely casting-based.
  • Absence of clear intersectional identity politics within the provided character details.

AI Analysis

Beatrice Pollet’s film offers a nuanced look at bodily autonomy by centering a psychological phenomenon that defies scientific consensus. It moves beyond simple representation to explore how the mind can subvert biological reality. The work succeeds in disrupting traditional medical narratives, particularly regarding the female experience. By focusing on the tension of pregnancy denial, it avoids superficial tropes and instead engages with complex, non-normative cognitive states. While the film lacks explicit intersectional identity markers, its thematic interest in the 'unseen' and the failure of empirical certainty provides a progressive, character-driven framework.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for The Consequences

The Consequences

2021

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.9 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.