You are here:
Die Hebamme II

Die Hebamme II

2016

Director

Hannu Salonen

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In the second part of the historical thriller, midwife Gesa succeeds in becoming the first female medical student to be admitted to Vienna's General Hospital. But while Gesa immerses herself in the world of medicine, a gruesome series of murders begins to spread fear and terror among the women.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The narrative focuses on the protagonist's professional survival and medical studies. There is no visible evidence of queer identities or non-heteronormative relationships within the story.

Gender Representation

Excellent

Gesa serves as a powerful figure of intellectual agency. By becoming the first female medical student in Vienna, she actively subverts the patriarchal gatekeeping of the medical establishment.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

Set in historical Vienna, the film appears to reflect the demographic homogeneity of the era. There is no indication of diverse racial casting or significant ethnic blending.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The story critiques rigid Western institutional structures. It highlights the tension between individual pursuit of knowledge and the oppressive social orders of the time.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film provides no information regarding characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Strengths

  • Strong emphasis on female intellectual agency and professional autonomy.
  • Effective subversion of historical patriarchal hierarchies in medicine.
  • Engaging critique of exclusionary institutional structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of visible LGBTQ+ representation or queer identities.
  • Limited racial and ethnic diversity within the historical setting.
  • Absence of characters representing various disabilities.

AI Analysis

Die Hebamme II excels in its portrayal of female agency, centering on a woman's struggle to break into the male-dominated medical field of historical Vienna. This subversion of gendered power dynamics provides a strong progressive core to the drama. However, the film's historical setting appears to limit its scope in other areas. The lack of visible LGBTQ+ representation and the likely demographic homogeneity of the period result in lower scores for racial and queer diversity. Ultimately, the film is a study of institutional disruption, prioritizing gendered professional autonomy over a broad spectrum of social identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.