
At Home with the Rozes
2003

2010
Director
Isabelle Mergault
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Condamné pour un crime qui n'était, selon lui, qu'un accident, Constant réussit à s'évader de la prison où il purge sa peine... Après une fuite aveugle, livré à tous les hasards, Constant finit par échouer dans un coin perdu, près des berges désertes d'un canal.... Se cachant sur une péniche à l'abandon, Constant tente de reprendre son souffle, accalmie de courte durée... Dès l'aube, Sylvia une pétillante jeune femme qui a reconnu l'homme traqué, lui propose un implacable marché : assassiner (puisqu'elle le pense être un tueur professionnel) Jeanne, sa mère adoptive sinon elle le dénonce à la police ! Piégé, Constant ne peut qu'accepter cette périlleuse " mission ". Mais bien loin de tuer Jeanne, Constant la sauve d'un suicide annoncé.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The plot focuses on a transactional relationship between a fugitive and a young woman without queer subtext.
Gender Representation
Sylvia drives the plot, exerting significant influence over the male protagonist through a high-stakes ultimatum. This subverts traditional masculine hero tropes by placing the male lead in a reactive position.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative suggests a localized, potentially homogeneous social environment. There is no evidence of a diverse cast or intersectional identities within the known framework.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story deconstructs traditional justice and idealized domesticity. It portrays familial bonds as dysfunctional and transactional through the conflict between Sylvia and her adoptive mother, Jeanne.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the provided material.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Fair is Fair succeeds in subverting traditional gender dynamics by centering female agency. Sylvia acts as the primary catalyst, forcing the male protagonist into a vulnerable, reactive role that challenges standard comedic archetypes. However, the film lacks significant intersectional visibility. The narrative appears focused on a homogeneous social environment, offering little representation regarding racial diversity or LGBTQ+ identities. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its skeptical view of institutional authority and traditional family structures, providing a nuanced departure from conventional tropes despite its limited demographic breadth.

2003

2015

2021

2005

1999

2016

1999

1975

2020

2011

1996

2019
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.