
Portrait of a '60% Perfect Man': Billy Wilder
1982

2017
Director
Pierre-Henri Gibert
Runtime
60 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Great filmmakers claim the artistic influence of French director Henri-Georges Clouzot (1907-1977), a master of suspense, with a unique vision of the world, who knew how to offer both great shows and subtle studies of characters. Beyond the myth of the tyrannical director, a contrasting portrait of a visionary, an agitator, an artist against the system.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary does not explicitly feature LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It maintains a neutral stance, focusing instead on the professional legacy of a legendary director.
Gender Representation
The film attempts to dismantle the myth of the tyrannical, patriarchal director. By presenting Clouzot as a visionary rather than a despot, it subverts traditional tropes of male authority.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The subject matter is deeply rooted in mid-20th-century French cinematic history. Consequently, the film lacks evidence of diverse casting or a focus on intersectional racial dynamics.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative adopts a progressive framework by celebrating the 'agitator' archetype. It critiques institutional power and celebrates an artist working against established systemic norms.
Disability Representation
There is no information available regarding the depiction of physical or mental disabilities within this documentary.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Clouzot Scandal functions primarily as a thematic critique of industry hierarchies rather than a study of demographic diversity. Its strength lies in its intellectual approach to deconstructing the 'great man' myth, offering a more nuanced view of creative authority. However, the film's focus on a specific Eurocentric cinematic era limits its intersectional reach. While it challenges systemic power, it does so through a narrow historical lens that lacks broader racial or queer representation. Ultimately, the documentary is a specialized historical interrogation. It succeeds in cultural subversion but remains limited by its specific, traditional subject matter.

1982

1982

2025

1996
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.