You are here:

What the #$*! Do We (K)now!?

What the #$*! Do We (K)now!?

Representation Score

6.5/10

Good

2004

Not Rated

Director

William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente

Runtime

109 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film disrupts Western epistemological hierarchies by presenting a multifaceted view of reality. It goes beyond a purely materialist perspective to incorporate various philosophical frameworks. By placing a female protagonist at the heart of a traditionally male-dominated intellectual space, the film highlights women's significant role in driving the narrative. The inclusion of global thinkers ensures the narrative is not confined to a Western-centric viewpoint. However, the film does not specifically address LGBTQ+ identities or disabilities, limiting its engagement with social identity diversity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film avoids focusing on specific LGBTQ+ identities and instead centers on philosophical inquiries. It steers clear of both direct representation and negative stereotypes related to queer individuals.

How does What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? portray gender?

Good

Amanda, the female lead, drives the exploration of reality. Her journey challenges male-dominated scientific ideas by highlighting a woman's intellectual and spiritual awakening as a means to universal truth.

How racially and ethnically diverse is What the #$*! Do We (K)now!??

Good

The film incorporates a wide range of global thinkers, moving away from an Anglo-centric viewpoint. This approach includes non-Western perspectives in discussions about consciousness.

How does What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film questions Western scientific thought by emphasizing Eastern philosophical traditions. It promotes a subjective understanding of existence that values diverse philosophical viewpoints over empirical science.

Does What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? include disability representation?

Minimal

The film does not depict any significant instances of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. None of the characters use disability as a central plot device or defining trait.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges male-dominated scientific ideas by focusing on a female protagonist's intellectual journey.
  • Integrates Eastern philosophical traditions and non-materialist perspectives to question Western scientific thought.
  • Includes a diverse array of global thinkers to promote intellectual pluralism.

Limited or Absent

  • Does not explicitly represent or center LGBTQ+ identities and narratives.
  • Provides no significant depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Focuses heavily on abstract philosophy rather than specific social identity-based storytelling.

Official Synopsis

Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. During the Fall of the year Amanda begins to see the world in new and different ways when she begins to question her role in life, her relationships with her career and men and what it all means. As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders impart information directly to an off-screen interviewer about academic issues, and Amanda begins to understand the basis to the quantum world beneath. During her epiphany as she considers the Great Questions raised by the host of inserted thinkers, she slowly comprehends the various inspirations and begins to see the world in a new way.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.