
Fun Size Horror: Volume Two
2015

2015
Director
Grant Olin, Anthony Lund, Erin Stegeman, Michael May, Max Isaacson, Dick Grunert, Lisa J. Dooley, Mali Elfman, Ben Rekhi, Jerry Pyle, Anisa Qureshi, Eric Pereira, Zeke Pinheiro, Ali Presley Paras, Glen Murakami, Ned Ehrbar, Josh C. Waller
Runtime
86 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Thirty-one twisted tales made from a collective of genre loving filmmakers, Fun Size Horror: Volume One aims to chill and delight horror fans. From classic slashers and creature features, to horror-comedy and hauntings all made into bite size pieces. Like a bag of Halloween candy after a night of trick or treating, Fun Size Horror: Volume One is filled with the unexpected and not without the threat of the occasional razor blade. Which leaves only one question: Trick or treat?
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The anthology format offers a wide breadth of perspectives through its many creators. However, explicit depictions of queer identities or same-sex intimacy are not central to the film's primary overview.
Gender Representation
A significant number of female directors, including Erin Stegeman and Anisa Qureshi, contribute to the creative collective. This distribution helps disrupt the traditional male-dominated hierarchy often found in horror.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The involvement of a large, multi-director team suggests a high probability of racial and ethnic diversity. The collective model serves as a platform for varied cultural perspectives.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The collection of twisted tales explores subjective morality and the deconstruction of safety. This approach suggests a departure from singular, monolithic moral frameworks.
Disability Representation
There is no specific evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. A definitive score cannot be assigned without risking inaccurate interpretation.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film's primary progressive value lies in its democratic creative structure. By utilizing a massive, multi-disciplinary collective of thirty-one filmmakers, the production moves away from the singular auteur model toward a more diverse ecosystem. While the individual shorts may vary in their adherence to traditional tropes, the sheer number of independent creators increases the likelihood of diverse lived experiences being represented. The anthology format inherently provides a foundation for varied storytelling. However, the fragmented nature of the micro-narratives makes a holistic assessment of character representation difficult. Without granular data on specific character archetypes, it is hard to confirm if the films subvert or reinforce genre conventions.

2015

2022

2021

2013

2016

2006

2017

2007

2023

2021

2019

2018
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.