
Blue Ridge
2020

Representation Score
Excellent
2025
RDirector
Ari Aster
Runtime
148 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Eddington deconstructs the neo-Western genre by replacing competent male heroes with paranoid and incompetent figures. This structural shift allows for a nuanced critique of authority, where traditional power dynamics are rendered farcical. The film portrays male leadership as deeply flawed and ineffective, undermining the genre’s historical glorification of masculine authority. The inclusion of Micheal Ward as a radical cult leader provides significant racial diversity, offering a Black character with substantial ideological ability to act. This contrasts sharply with traditional Westerns, where non-white characters often occupy marginal roles. The film explores systemic power struggles, making race a central driver of the narrative conflict. Gender representation is strengthened by the ability to act granted to female characters, who destabilize the male-dominated political order. However, the complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation remains a notable gap. The film’s focus on heterosexual domestic tensions and political rivalry leaves no room for queer narratives, resulting in a lower score for inclusivity despite its progressive stance on other fronts.
Category Breakdown
The film focuses on heterosexual domestic tensions and does not include any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. While it avoids actively hostile attitudes towards queer identities, the absence of visible representation means the film scores low for progressive inclusion.
Male leaders are portrayed as paranoid and incompetent, subverting traditional masculinity. Female characters like Louise and Dawn play significant roles in driving the plot through emotional volatility and ideological chaos, rather than passive support.
Micheal Ward’s character, Vernon Jefferson Peak, is portrayed as a actively leading radical leader, challenging typical Western clichés. This casting highlights systemic racial tensions and resistance, providing a strong example of racial diversity.
The film criticizes traditional Western institutions, depicting law enforcement and government as corrupt and paranoid. It presents modern capitalism and big tech as the true antagonists, framing societal breakdown as a symptom of structural failure rather than individual moral decay.
Mental instability is shown as a rational response to chaos, avoiding the portrayal of it as a medical condition to be cured. However, the film lacks explicit representation for physical or neurodivergent disabilities in agentic roles, which limits its overall score.
Present on Screen
Limited or Absent
Official Synopsis
In May of 2020, a standoff between a small-town sheriff and mayor sparks a powder keg as neighbor is pitted against neighbor in Eddington, New Mexico.

2020

2019

2025

2026

2019

2024

2025

2001
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.