New Showbiz

You are here:
Eddington

Eddington

2025

R

Director

Ari Aster

Runtime

148 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In May of 2020, a standoff between a small-town sheriff and mayor sparks a powder keg as neighbor is pitted against neighbor in Eddington, New Mexico.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.8/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives, focusing instead on heterosexual domestic tensions. While it avoids active hostility toward queer identities, the absence of visible representation results in a low score for progressive inclusion.

Gender Representation

Good

The film subverts traditional masculinity by portraying male leaders as paranoid and incompetent. Female characters like Louise and Dawn wield significant agency, driving the plot through emotional volatility and ideological chaos rather than passive support.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

Micheal Ward’s character, Vernon Jefferson Peak, serves as a high-agency radical leader, subverting typical Western tropes. This casting places a Black actor in a position of intense ideological power, directly engaging with systemic racial tensions and resistance.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative critiques traditional Western institutions, depicting law enforcement and government as corrupt and paranoid. It frames modern capitalism and big tech as the true antagonists, presenting societal breakdown as a symptom of structural failure rather than individual moral decay.

Disability Representation

Fair

Mental instability is portrayed as a rational response to chaos rather than a medical condition to be cured. While the film avoids inspiration porn, the lack of explicit representation for physical or neurodivergent disabilities in agentic roles limits its overall score.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional masculinity by portraying male leaders as paranoid and incompetent.
  • Features a high-agency Black character who drives ideological conflict and resistance.
  • Grants female characters significant agency through emotional volatility and chaos.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives, limiting progressive visibility.
  • Focuses primarily on psychological instability rather than physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Does not offer clear moral resolutions, potentially leaving audiences without constructive guidance.

AI Analysis

Eddington actively deconstructs the neo-Western genre by replacing the competent male hero with paranoid, incompetent figures. This structural shift allows for a nuanced critique of authority, where traditional power dynamics are rendered farcical. The film’s strength lies in its willingness to portray male leadership as deeply flawed and ineffective, undermining the genre’s historical glorification of masculine authority. The inclusion of Micheal Ward as a radical cult leader provides significant racial diversity, offering a Black character with substantial ideological agency. This contrasts sharply with traditional Westerns, where non-white characters often occupy marginal roles. The film uses this dynamic to explore systemic power struggles, making race a central driver of the narrative conflict rather than a background element. Gender representation is strengthened by the agency granted to female characters, who destabilize the male-dominated political order. However, the complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation remains a notable gap. The film’s focus on heterosexual domestic tensions and political rivalry leaves no room for queer narratives, resulting in a lower score for inclusivity despite its progressive stance on other fronts.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Racial & Ethnic Representation in Film
  • Best Racial & Ethnic Representation of the 2020s
  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Lonesome Cowboys

Lonesome Cowboys

1968

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.9 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.