You are here:

The Goldcabbage Family Gets the Vote

The Goldcabbage Family Gets the Vote

Representation Score

3.7/10

Limited

1977

Not Rated

Director

Bent Christensen

Runtime

81 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The Goldcabbage Family Gets the Vote is a period-specific social comedy that emphasizes family dynamics and political satire. While it uses an unconventional election campaign to critique local authority, the narrative remains grounded in a traditional framework. The film's focus on a specific Danish family unit limits its representation of racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ diversity, reflecting the social context of 1977 Denmark. Ultimately, the film serves as a satire of institutional structures rather than a vehicle for progressive representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Goldcabbage Family Gets the Vote have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not include explicit representations of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships. It follows traditional standards without challenging assumptions about gender and sexuality.

How does The Goldcabbage Family Gets the Vote portray gender?

Fair

The story focuses on Charles Gyldenkål's rise in politics. Although the campaign is described as unconventional, the film adheres to traditional gender roles typical of 1970s municipal comedies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Goldcabbage Family Gets the Vote?

Limited

As a localized Danish production, the film reflects a homogeneous society. There is minimal depiction of racial or ethnic diversity within the family-focused narrative.

How does The Goldcabbage Family Gets the Vote represent religion and culture?

Fair

The narrative provides a satirical perspective on municipal power and local governance. It explores institutional structures during a financial downturn and political maneuvering.

Does The Goldcabbage Family Gets the Vote include disability representation?

Minimal

The film does not feature any characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • The film offers a satirical critique of municipal power and the mechanics of local governance.
  • The unconventional election campaign provides a unique look at political maneuvering within a family comedy setting.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships.
  • The film shows limited racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting a highly homogeneous social environment.
  • There is no visible representation of characters with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

The final film in the Gyldenkål trilogy. Following a financial downturn, Charles Gyldenkål decides to run for municipal office. After an unconventional election campaign, he is elected to the city council and becomes the deciding vote in the mayoral election.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.