You are here:
Oldies But Goodies

Oldies But Goodies

2024

Director

Claude Zidi Jr.

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

As the Lino Vartan shelter, which takes orphans and seniors in, has to shut down for health issues, Milann has no choice but to accept the invitation of a retirement home in the south of France.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.2/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film includes queer icons like Amanda Lear, providing atmospheric texture. However, LGBTQ+ identities are not central to the plot or character agency.

Gender Representation

Fair

Elderly women are granted social autonomy and comedic agency. While the film avoids portraying them as submissive, it occasionally relies on established gender tropes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

A multi-ethnic ensemble, including actors like Firmine Richard, challenges the homogeneity of traditional elderly depictions. This creates a more pluralistic social model.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The story critiques Western elder care institutions and capitalist management. It frames systemic authority as flawed by referencing real-world care scandals.

Disability Representation

Fair

Representation focuses on the biological realities of aging. Physical limitations are sometimes used as comedic catalysts rather than exploring disability through high agency.

Strengths

  • Features a multi-ethnic ensemble that challenges traditional depictions of elderly social structures.
  • Critiques systemic failures in Western elder care and institutional management.
  • Grants elderly female characters social autonomy and comedic agency.

Areas for Improvement

  • Avoids using the physical limitations of aging characters as mere comedic catalysts.
  • Could integrate LGBTQ+ identities more deeply into the core character arcs.
  • Needs to move beyond established tropes regarding age and gender in its comedic structure.

AI Analysis

Oldies But Goodies (2024) functions as a comedic critique of institutional elder care. It succeeds in presenting a multi-ethnic ensemble that disrupts the typical homogeneity of retirement settings. The film's strength lies in its willingness to challenge systemic authority and the predatory nature of care management. However, the film struggles with depth in its representation of specific identities. LGBTQ+ presence remains atmospheric rather than narrative-driven, and disability is often reduced to the physical vulnerabilities of aging. The comedic structure occasionally leans on regressive tropes regarding gender and age. Ultimately, the film occupies a middle ground. It uses its comedic framework to address serious social issues like the Orpea scandal, providing a progressive layer to an otherwise traditional genre piece.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.