
The Right Kind of Wrong
2013

2013
RDirector
Adam Rodgers
Runtime
101 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
George is an uptight surgeon with a rebellious teenage son. Edith is a free spirit with an overachieving teenage daughter. When they meet during an admissions tour with their kids at the small, idyllic Middleton University, they decide to ditch the group. Though adversaries at first, they soon discover that the only thing better than the college tour, is the detour.
Overall Score
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The story centers on a heterosexual romance between George and Edith. There is no evidence of queer subtext or non-cisnormative identities in the character arcs.
Gender Representation
The film employs a classic opposites-attract trope between a male professional and a female free spirit. While it follows traditional structures, the female lead shows agency through her spontaneous detour.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative lacks any indication of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon cast. The setting and character descriptions suggest a conventional, homogeneous focus.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot explores the tension between institutional structure and individual spontaneity. It prioritizes personal liberation and subjective experience over rigid societal adherence.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the provided character data or synopsis.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
At Middleton follows a conventional romantic comedy trajectory, focusing on the chemistry between two parents during a college tour. The narrative relies heavily on established tropes, such as the uptight professional meeting the free spirit, which keeps the story within safe, predictable bounds. The film lacks meaningful representation across most intersectional categories. There is no visible presence of LGBTQ+ characters, racial diversity, or characters with disabilities, resulting in a homogeneous viewing experience that mirrors traditional Hollywood archetypes. While the film offers a moderate exploration of individualist values versus institutionalism, it does not attempt to subvert systemic hierarchies. It remains a character-driven romance that prioritizes personal connection over social or cultural disruption.

2013

2005

2009

2007

2008

2011

2004

2011

2020

2003

2011

2008
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.