You are here:

Field of Fire

Field of Fire

Representation Score

1.0/10

Minimal

1991

R

Director

Cirio H. Santiago

Runtime

96 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Field of Fire is a classic 1990s action-exploitation film that prioritizes fast-paced combat over social complexity. The narrative leans on well-known archetypes, particularly the competent male leader and supporting characters who play secondary roles. The film adheres to the conventional standards of its time. It upholds traditional hierarchies rather than challenging them through nuanced character development or diverse storytelling approaches. Ultimately, the production is a straightforward example of the genre, focusing on the mechanics of jungle warfare and mission success without engaging with broader societal issues or diverse identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Field of Fire have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any characters with non-binary or LGBTQ+ identities. The story revolves around a male-dominated military unit with no acknowledgment of diverse sexual orientations or gender identities.

How does Field of Fire portray gender?

Limited

The narrative emphasizes traditional masculine leadership roles. Female characters are relegated to secondary positions that reinforce existing gender stereotypes and do not challenge traditional gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Field of Fire?

Limited

The film features a predominantly white cast. Southeast Asian actors play roles as insurgents or local inhabitants, serving mainly as obstacles or background elements in the plot.

How does Field of Fire represent religion and culture?

Limited

The film follows typical Western action movie conventions. It avoids delving into religious, political, or socioeconomic complexities, focusing instead on combat and survival scenarios.

Does Field of Fire include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no representation of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities. The story centers on able-bodied combatants without addressing any disabilities among the characters.

Present on Screen

  • The film effectively adheres to the established conventions of the 1990s action-exploitation genre.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative should aim to disrupt traditional social and identity-based hierarchies more intentionally.
  • Character development should move beyond relying on standard masculine archetypes.
  • The film should offer more substantial roles for Southeast Asian characters.
  • Representation of LGBTQ+ identities and disabilities should be included.

Official Synopsis

Sergeant Thomas Duncan takes his men behind enemy lines to recover a secret government fighter copter and its pilot, a secret weapon all his own. But once stationed in the dense jungle brush of Vietnam, their radio goes out all hope of contacting their home base is out, and it is up to Duncan and his men to get to the hook up point by the agreed time. A traitor in the home camp is sending messages to the enemy side; Duncan must hurry!

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.