New Showbiz

You are here:

No Poster Available

Jiminy

2013

Director

Arthur Môlard

Runtime

20 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In the near future, most people get a "cricket" implanted in their brains : an electronic chip which allows them to switch to an "automatic mode" whenever they wish to.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.0/10

Minimal

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no mention of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. There is no evidence of narratives addressing heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Minimal

The narrative centers on a technological premise featuring a singular protagonist. It lacks evidence regarding gendered power dynamics or the subversion of gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The synopsis focuses on a near-future concept without detailing the racial composition of the cast. No evidence of racial metaphors or ethnic diversity is present.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The premise engages with themes of systemic control and the erosion of willpower. This aligns with sci-fi traditions critiquing dehumanizing technological structures.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The 'cricket' implant could potentially intersect with neurodivergence. However, there is no specific evidence that disability is a central theme or portrayed with agency.

Strengths

  • The science fiction premise provides a strong framework for exploring themes of autonomy and consciousness.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks intentional intersectional representation across gender, race, and sexual orientation.
  • There is no clear evidence of how the technological tension affects specific demographics.

AI Analysis

Jiminy is a conceptually driven science fiction short that prioritizes speculative inquiry over demographic breadth. The film explores the tension between individual agency and technological control through the concept of a brain implant. While the premise offers fertile ground for critiquing systemic forces, the work lacks intentional intersectional representation. There is no visible evidence of diversity regarding gender, race, or sexual orientation. The film's value lies in its exploration of the 'automatic' nature of future existence rather than its social inclusivity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.