
Brainstorm
1983

2012
RRuntime
85 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Thomas Jacobs invents a way to watch people's memories from the inside. Going against his morals, he accepts an offer to enter a heroin addict's memories to literally see if he committed a crime. However,a malfunction causes his consciousness to become trapped inside the criminal's mind. He remains a prisoner in the addict's memories for more than four years until he discovers the possibility of escape.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The plot centers on the psychological tension between Thomas Jacobs and a heroin addict. There is no visible evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities within the primary narrative arc.
Gender Representation
The story is driven by a male protagonist navigating a technological dilemma. It lacks female characters with high agency or the subversion of masculine leadership needed to move beyond a singular male-driven thriller.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative does not detail the racial or ethnic composition of the cast. Without information on the protagonist or the criminal, the film's approach to diverse character depth remains unverified.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
While exploring addiction and surveillance morality, the film follows a traditional thriller structure. It does not explicitly prioritize the deconstruction of Western institutions or systemic power dynamics.
Disability Representation
The film touches on addiction, which relates to mental health and neurobiological struggle. However, it is unclear if the addict is granted agency or used merely as a plot device.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Extracted is a character-driven science fiction thriller that prioritizes individual psychological survival and technological ethics. The narrative relies heavily on a singular male perspective, focusing on the high-stakes dilemma of a man trapped within a criminal's memories. While the premise of exploring addiction offers a window into complex human conditions, the film appears to adhere to conventional genre tropes. It lacks explicit evidence of diverse casting, gender subversion, or a critique of systemic social hierarchies. Ultimately, the film functions as a contained psychological study rather than a work designed to disrupt cultural or social norms.

1983

2020

2004

2022

2009

2014

2020

2011

2013

2009

2011

1983
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.