New Showbiz

You are here:
Good Time

Good Time

2017

R

Director

Benny Safdie, Josh Safdie

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

After a botched bank robbery lands his younger brother in prison, Connie Nikas embarks on a twisted odyssey through New York City's underworld to get his brother Nick out of jail.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.7/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters and does not explore non-heteronormative identities. The plot focuses exclusively on the fraternal bond between the central male protagonists.

Gender Representation

Limited

The narrative is heavily male-dominated, emphasizing archetypes of aggression and impulsivity. Female characters remain peripheral, lacking the agency to drive the central plot.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is predominantly white, focusing on a specific socioeconomic stratum. While the setting is urban, the central social circles do not disrupt Anglo-centric casting norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film excels by deconstructing Western institutions through moral relativism. It portrays legal and economic systems as oppressive structures that force characters into desperate, anti-social survivalism.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities that serve as central narrative drivers in this story.

Strengths

  • Sophisticated critique of Western legal and economic institutions.
  • Nuanced exploration of moral relativism and situational ethics.
  • Effective portrayal of the friction between individuals and oppressive systemic structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative themes.
  • Minimal female agency, with women relegated to peripheral roles.
  • Predominantly white cast that adheres to traditional Anglo-centric casting norms.

AI Analysis

Good Time is a hyper-kinetic character study that prioritizes visceral survival over traditional moral structures. While it succeeds in its thematic subversion of social institutions, it remains demographically narrow. The film's strength lies in its sophisticated critique of systemic instability. It uses a postmodern lens to examine the friction between marginalized individuals and the state, replacing traditional notions of justice with situational ethics. However, the film lacks demographic breadth. The focus on a homogeneous, male-centric social unit results in low representation across gender, race, and LGBTQ+ identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Reservoir Dogs

Reservoir Dogs

1992

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.