You are here:

Love at Stake

Love at Stake

Representation Score

2.9/10

Limited

1987

R

Director

John Moffitt

Runtime

86 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Love at Stake is a genre-driven period piece that prioritizes traditional fantasy-horror clichés over social subversion. While it offers a critique of local corruption and the misuse of legal authority, the narrative remains firmly within the conventional structures of its era. The film lacks intentionality regarding identity-based representation, focusing instead on land disputes and patriarchal legal structures. Ultimately, it functions as a standard historical fantasy, exploring themes of greed and systemic corruption but failing to engage with broader social or multi-layered narratives.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Love at Stake have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not explicitly include characters with non-traditional gender identities. The plot revolves around a handsome stranger, which aligns with traditional romantic expectations.

How does Love at Stake portray gender?

Fair

The narrative centers on a power struggle between male authority figures such as the mayor and judge. There is no clear evidence of women taking a leading role or disrupting traditional gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Love at Stake?

Limited

Set in 1692 Salem, the story is rooted in a historically homogeneous period. There are no indications of non-Anglo-Saxon characters or actors from diverse backgrounds.

How does Love at Stake represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film critiques institutional corruption and the misuse of religious authority for land theft. However, it remains anchored in a Western historical context.

Does Love at Stake include disability representation?

Minimal

The character descriptions do not mention any visible or invisible disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a critique of institutional corruption and the misuse of religious and legal authority for personal gain.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of non-traditional gender identities or diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds.
  • Does not demonstrate significant women's ability to drive the story or disruption of traditional gender hierarchies.
  • Adheres to the homogeneous social constraints of its 1692 Salem setting.

Official Synopsis

Salem, 1692. The mayor and judge are accusing land owner of witchery in order to grab their land. No one knows that are handsome stranger is a real witch and has evil plans for the town.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.