You are here:

Results

Results

Representation Score

4.2/10

Fair

2015

R

Director

Andrew Bujalski

Runtime

105 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Andrew Bujalski’s *Results* stands out for its use of a mumblecore aesthetic to replace polished archetypes with raw, naturalistic portrayals of human error. The film excels in its sophisticated deconstruction of traditional dramatic pacing through improvisational-style dialogue. However, the film remains demographically conservative, focusing on micro-level human interactions rather than broader discussions of systemic power dynamics. The narrative environment is largely homogeneous, centered around a specific socioeconomic bubble.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Results have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The story primarily focuses on conflicts between heterosexual couples and lacks characters who identify outside the cisgender norm. It also doesn't challenge traditional social structures.

How does Results portray gender?

Fair

The film challenges traditional gender roles by showing both men and women facing vulnerabilities together. It avoids the 'competent leader' archetype and instead focuses on realistic, messy interpersonal relationships.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Results?

Limited

The cast is mainly white and middle-class, reflecting a specific socioeconomic group. The story lacks diverse casting and fails to explore multiple aspects of identity.

How does Results represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film portrays characters navigating a capitalist economy through awkward situations and anxiety. It highlights individual struggles rather than institutional stability.

Does Results include disability representation?

Minimal

The film does not prominently depict physical, sensory, or neurodivergent identities. Characters face psychological struggles without framing them through the lens of disability.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional gender hierarchies by showing characters facing vulnerabilities together.
  • Replaces polished cinematic archetypes with a raw, naturalistic portrayal of human error.
  • Offers a sophisticated deconstruction of traditional dramatic pacing through improvisational-style dialogue.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks diverse casting and exploration of multiple aspects of identity.
  • Does not include non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth identities or narratives that challenge traditional social structures.
  • Provides no prominent depictions of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent identities.

Official Synopsis

Two mismatched personal trainers' lives are upended by the actions of a new, wealthy client.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.