
A Diary of a Murderess
1975

2000
Director
Michael Rissi
Runtime
102 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
After childhood abuse by her step-father and eight years in a juvenile psychiatric lockup, Amanda Lear is released. Her shrink is also her lover, who surreptitiously pays her rent on a nice house for a year. She moves in, takes one look at her neighbor Richard, and dispatches her doctor. To cover her tracks and to begin her seduction, she gets Richard's help with a security system. Soon she's bugging his calls and spying on him with hidden cameras, taking advantage of a rift between Richard and his wife who's in Nashville cutting a record. Amanda will stop at nothing to get Richard's exclusive attention. Will this good neighbor wise up before the hot tub overheats?
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a heteronormative pursuit of romantic and sexual dominance. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or critiques of heteronormativity within the story.
Gender Representation
Amanda Lear disrupts conventional hierarchies by exerting extreme agency through criminal means. She is portrayed as a manipulator rather than a submissive figure, shifting power away from traditional male-led thriller structures.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative offers no indication of racial or ethnic diversity. The focus remains strictly on the interpersonal dynamics of the central characters without mentioning non-Anglo-Saxon representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film explores moral relativism by centering a protagonist who rejects legal and ethical boundaries. It suggests a worldview where traditional morality is secondary to individual impulse.
Disability Representation
Mental health history is a foundational element of the protagonist's backstory. However, the portrayal leans toward the dangerous trope common in psychological thrillers rather than offering nuanced agency.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Up Against Amanda operates primarily as a traditional genre thriller. While it subverts gendered power dynamics by giving the female protagonist high levels of agency, it lacks meaningful intersectional representation. The film relies on established tropes, particularly regarding mental health and predatory romantic behavior. It fails to include diverse racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ identities, keeping the scope narrow and heteronormative. Ultimately, the narrative's strength lies in its character-driven agency, but its failure to engage with broader social identities results in a low diversity score.

1975

1995

1996

2005

1994

1993

2002

2006

1995

2023

2023

1992
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.