New Showbiz

You are here:
We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story

We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story

1993

G

Director

Phil Nibbelink, Simon Wells, Dick Zondag, Ralph Zondag

Runtime

71 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Captain New Eyes travels back in time and feeds dinosaurs his Brain Grain cereal, which makes them intelligent and non-violent. They agree to go to the "Middle Future" in order to grant the wishes of children in New York City. They are to meet Dr. Bleeb of the Museum of Natural History, but get sidetracked with their new children friends and run into the Captain's evil brother, Professor Screweyes.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.1/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. It relies on conventional character archetypes typical of early 90s family animation.

Gender Representation

Fair

The central conflict focuses on male figures, specifically Captain New Eyes and Professor Screweyes. There is no evidence of subverting traditional gender hierarchies or deconstructing masculinity.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

While set in a diverse New York City, the narrative drivers are anthropomorphic dinosaurs. The film lacks high-agency characters of color or intentional racial blending.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story follows a traditional hero/villain dichotomy rather than exploring moral relativism. It lacks explicit critiques of Western institutions or anti-capitalist themes.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible evidence regarding the portrayal of visible or invisible disabilities. No characters are identified as having neurodivergence or physical impairments.

Strengths

  • The use of non-human characters provides a unique canvas for potential metaphorical storytelling.
  • The setting in New York City offers a backdrop of a naturally diverse urban environment.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks high-agency characters of color or intentional racial representation.
  • The story relies on traditional male-centric conflicts rather than subverting gender hierarchies.
  • There is a complete absence of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
  • The film fails to include characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film operates as a traditional science-fiction adventure that prioritizes genre tropes over systemic subversion. The narrative structure relies on a standard hero versus villain dynamic, which limits its capacity for social commentary. While the anthropomorphic dinosaurs offer a potential canvas for metaphor, the story lacks the intentionality needed to disrupt social expectations. The focus remains on mainstream, family-oriented storytelling rather than intersectional depth. Ultimately, the production reflects the conventional social landscape of the early 1990s, favoring established archetypes over diverse or complex identity representations.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Ice Age: A Mammoth Christmas

Ice Age: A Mammoth Christmas

2011

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.