You are here:

United States of Secrets (Part Two): Privacy Lost

United States of Secrets (Part Two): Privacy Lost

Representation Score

3.0/10

Limited

2014

TV-PG

Director

Martin Smith

Runtime

54 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This investigative documentary serves as a critique of systemic power rather than a vehicle for demographic representation. It prioritizes the examination of institutional integrity over the exploration of individual identities. The film's strength lies in its progressive challenge to Western technological and security structures. It highlights the tension between individual ability to act and the encroaching power of state and corporate entities. However, the narrative lacks multi-layered character studies. By focusing on the mechanics of the surveillance state, it misses opportunities to explore how these systems impact specific demographic groups.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does United States of Secrets (Part Two): Privacy Lost have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The documentary focuses on geopolitical and technological surveillance without depicting interpersonal relationships or narratives involving LGBTQ+ identities.

How does United States of Secrets (Part Two): Privacy Lost portray gender?

Fair

The film emphasizes institutional authority and systemic structures rather than exploring gender dynamics or hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is United States of Secrets (Part Two): Privacy Lost?

Fair

The documentary centers on US-based corporations and government agencies, focusing on the mechanics of the surveillance state without addressing multi-layered racial experiences.

How does United States of Secrets (Part Two): Privacy Lost represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The narrative critiques the transparency and morality of Western technological and governmental institutions, challenging the modern social contract and institutional trust.

Does United States of Secrets (Part Two): Privacy Lost include disability representation?

Minimal

The documentary does not address neurodivergence, physical disabilities, or mental health conditions.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges the perceived integrity of Western technological and security structures.
  • Provides a progressive interrogation of institutional power and systemic transparency.
  • Highlights the tension between individual ability to act and state/corporate encroachment.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks multi-layered character studies to drive the narrative.
  • Does not explore the specific impacts of surveillance on diverse racial or ethnic groups.
  • Fails to address disability, neurodivergence, or mental health within the context of privacy.

Official Synopsis

An investigation into the hidden relationship between Silicon Valley and the National Security Agency.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.