You are here:

The Sting II

Name: The Sting II
Director: Jeremy Kagan
Released: 1983
Duration: 102 min

Representation Score

2.9/10

Limited

1983

Director

Jeremy Kagan

Runtime

102 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The Sting II functions as a standard genre sequel that prioritizes comedic pacing and narrative continuity over social reconfiguration. It adheres to the established clichés of the caper and crime comedy genres. While the inclusion of a female con artist offers a minor degree of gender ability to act, the film lacks the intentionality needed to challenge systemic hierarchies. The storytelling remains centered on male-led schemes and traditional structures. Ultimately, the work reflects the era's casting and narrative norms, focusing on situational ethics and individual skill.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Sting II have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film follows traditional social norms and does not include any queer identities or narratives that critique the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does The Sting II portray gender?

Fair

Veronica, a new grifter, provides a female character with professional ability to act. However, the main plot is driven by male characters, maintaining traditional gender power dynamics.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Sting II?

Limited

The film reflects the homogeneous casting norms typical of 1980s crime comedies and does not show a diverse range of ethnicities.

How does The Sting II represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film engages with heist genre clichés through a framework focused on subjective morality. It emphasizes individual wit rather than critiquing Western institutions.

Does The Sting II include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed as central to the character arcs or plot progression.

Present on Screen

The introduction of Veronica provides a female character with professional ability to act within the criminal underworld.

Limited or Absent

The film lacks meaningful representation of diverse identities or intentionality to challenge systemic hierarchies.
The narrative structure relies on homogeneous casting norms typical of 1980s crime comedies.
The central plot engine remains heavily centered on male-led schemes and traditional power dynamics.

Official Synopsis

Hooker and Gondorf pull a con on Macalinski, an especially nasty mob boss with the help of Veronica, a new grifter. They convince this new victim that Hooker is a somewhat dull boxer who is tired of taking dives for Gondorf. There is a ringer. Lonigan, their victim from the first movie, is setting them up to take the fall.

How are these scores produced? →