New Showbiz

You are here:
The Women Who Run Hollywood

The Women Who Run Hollywood

2016

Director

Clara Kuperberg, Julia Kuperberg

Runtime

52 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The first talkie was directed by Alice Guy, the first color film was produced by Lois Weber, who directed more than 300 films over 10 years. Frances Marion wrote screenplays for the Hollywood Star Mary Pickford and won two Oscars, Dorothy Arzner was the most powerful film director in Hollywood. And what do all of them have in common? They are all women and they have all been forgotten. Incredibly, it also took until 2010 for the first woman, Kathryn Bigelow, to win the Oscar for Best Director. Even if underrepresented women have always played a big part in Hollywood and it is this part of the film history left untold that this documentary sets out to uncover.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.8/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film explores female agency and gendered power dynamics within a male-dominated industry. While specific depictions of queer intimacy are not detailed, the inclusion of Dorothy Arzner suggests an engagement with non-traditional gender roles.

Gender Representation

Excellent

This documentary serves as a direct critique of patriarchal hierarchies in Hollywood. By centering pioneers like Alice Guy and Lois Weber, it repositions women as the primary architects of cinematic innovation.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The narrative focuses heavily on the structural erasure of women within the studio system. However, the analysis remains primarily gendered, with little explicit evidence regarding the intersection of race and gender.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film adopts a revisionist framework to challenge the official Western narrative of film history. It deconstructs dominant cultural canons by highlighting how institutional memory selectively excludes female contributors.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no specific evidence provided regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within this documentary.

Strengths

  • Effectively reframes women as foundational architects of cinematic technology and innovation.
  • Provides a powerful critique of patriarchal hierarchies and systemic institutional erasure.
  • Challenges the dominant Western narrative by prioritizing untold historical perspectives.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit focus on intersectional identities, particularly regarding women of color.
  • Provides no discernible representation or discussion of disability.
  • Does not offer specific details regarding the depiction of queer identities or intimacy.

AI Analysis

The documentary functions as a corrective historical tool, dismantling the masculine monopoly on cinematic history. It successfully reframes forgotten women not as mere exceptions, but as foundational pillars of the medium. Its primary strength is the disruption of the traditional Hollywood canon. By highlighting the massive gap between female contribution and institutional recognition, the film effectively critiques systemic media structures. However, the scope remains somewhat narrow. While it excels at gendered revisionism, it lacks explicit intersectional depth regarding racial diversity and does not address disability representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Women - For America, For the World

Women - For America, For the World

1986

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.8 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.