New Showbiz

You are here:
In Dog's Words

In Dog's Words

2016

Director

Marcos Jorge

Runtime

101 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

São Paulo, 2007. Santana works as a dogcatcher, picking up stray animals. He is a friendly guy, averse to trouble, who has always kept violence away from the doorsteps of his home. One day, he catches a very big dog in a school. Some days later, comes the animal's owner: Babyface, a sociopath ex-cop. The man is furious, considering his dog to be "kidnapped", and demands immediate restitution of his pet. But the dog is not coming back: according to the law, the animal was put to sleep. In a misunderstanding, Babyface argue with Santana, blaming him for his pet's death. From this moment on, Santana's life will be completely changed.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any discernible presence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focus remains strictly on a localized interpersonal conflict.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a masculine-coded conflict between a dogcatcher and an ex-cop. It lacks female characters in positions of agency or significant subversion of gendered power dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Set in São Paulo, the film utilizes a diverse urban backdrop. While specific racial identities aren't detailed, the socio-economic tension suggests a multi-ethnic social fabric.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative explores the friction between civic law and individual consequence. It deconstructs institutional authority by framing the antagonist as a former representative of state power.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence regarding the portrayal of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities within the narrative.

Strengths

  • The setting provides a naturalistic backdrop for a diverse, multi-ethnic urban environment.
  • The story offers a nuanced critique of institutional authority and state power.
  • It avoids simple hero-versus-villain tropes by focusing on complex social and legal friction.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks female characters with meaningful agency or influence.
  • There is a notable absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.
  • The film does not address physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

In Dog's Words is a character study focused on the disruption of social equilibrium. The film pits a non-violent working-class protagonist against a sociopathic former police officer, creating a critique of how authority figures interact with civilians. While the setting offers a naturalistic, multi-ethnic environment, the film relies on a traditional dramatic structure. It lacks explicit intersectional markers, particularly regarding gender and LGBTQ+ identities, which limits its progressive reach. The narrative succeeds in questioning the benevolence of institutions through its exploration of legalistic bureaucracy and individual consequence, though it remains a localized interpersonal drama.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.