You are here:

For the Rights of Man

Name: For the Rights of Man
Director: Hans Zöberlein
Released: 1934
Duration: 118 min

Representation Score

1.2/10

Minimal

1934

Director

Hans Zöberlein

Runtime

118 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Um das Menschenrecht is a Nazi propaganda film that glorifies the Freikorps movement and paramilitary structures. The narrative structure reinforces nationalist hierarchies and hyper-masculine archetypes of political violence. The film serves as a tool for social control, promoting ethnic homogeneity and excluding identities that do not align with the radicalized German nationalist identity of the time. Ultimately, the film upholds a singular, state-aligned morality by validating right-wing violence and power structures.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does For the Rights of Man have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or stories. It assumes everyone is straight, ignoring or suppressing non-straight identities.

How does For the Rights of Man portray gender?

Minimal

The story focuses on hyper-masculine characters involved in combat and political violence. Femininity is likely limited to domestic roles, secondary to the male-dominated paramilitary conflict.

How racially and ethnically diverse is For the Rights of Man?

Minimal

The film emphasizes a homogeneous, Aryan-centric worldview. It strengthens national identity by excluding non-white or non-Germanic identities.

How does For the Rights of Man represent religion and culture?

Minimal

The film promotes a radicalized, state-aligned version of national identity. Political opponents, such as communists, are portrayed as the systemic 'other' to be eliminated.

Does For the Rights of Man include disability representation?

Minimal

Physical and mental fitness are valued highly. Disability is likely used as a plot device to denote weakness compared to the 'ideal' soldier.

Limited or Absent

The film lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or stories.
The narrative relies on hyper-masculine archetypes that exclude diverse gender expressions.
The story promotes ethnic homogeneity and excludes non-Germanic identities.
Political opponents are framed as systemic 'others' rather than nuanced characters.
Disability is used as a tool to denote weakness rather than showing ability to act.

Official Synopsis

This Nazi propaganda film tells about the "freikorps" movement in post-World War I Germany. Freikorps were armed extreme-right-wing paramilitary groups, often composed of street thugs, ex-convicts and unemployed veterans, who engaged in street battles and assassinations of political opponents, usually leftist or Communist groups. Many of these "freikorps" were absorbed into the S.A. (Storm Troopers) and, later, the SS after Adolf Hitler came to power

How are these scores produced? →