You are here:

Bloomfield

Name: Bloomfield
Director: Richard Harris, Uri Zohar
Released: 1970
Duration: 94 min

Representation Score

4.3/10

Fair

1970

Director

Richard Harris, Uri Zohar

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Bloomfield is a character-driven drama that focuses on psychological realism rather than traditional sports clichés. The film examines the complexities of aging and professional integrity through a cynical lens. While the creative team suggests a capacity for non-traditional character studies, the narrative lacks overt representation of multiple identities. The focus remains on the male protagonist's internal struggles. Ultimately, the film avoids simplistic heroic archetypes, opting for a nuanced exploration of the corruption of professional systems and personal doubt.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Bloomfield have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not include any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or explore non-straight relationships. The focus is on a conventional romantic storyline.

How does Bloomfield portray gender?

Fair

Female characters are mainly defined by their relationships to the male protagonist. The narrative centers around his internal conflict and growth.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Bloomfield?

Fair

The film may engage with regional identities due to Uri Zohar's involvement. However, there are no specific details about a multi-ethnic cast.

How does Bloomfield represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story delves into moral relativism through an athlete's ethical dilemma, emphasizing subjective morality and professional disillusionment over strict institutional ethics.

Does Bloomfield include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no information about the depiction of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health conditions in this production.

Present on Screen

The collaboration between Richard Harris and Uri Zohar indicates a sophisticated, non-traditional narrative structure.
The film avoids clichéd sports hero clichés by focusing on moral ambiguity and professional disillusionment.

Limited or Absent

Female characters seem to serve primarily as foils for the male lead's development.
The narrative lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or diverse racial casting.

Official Synopsis

An aging soccer player has a part-time girlfriend, a young fan, and doubts about throwing a game.

How are these scores produced? →