You are here:

Roads in February

Roads in February

Representation Score

8.6/10

Excellent

2019

Director

Katherine Jerkovic

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Roads in February is a character-driven study of displacement and the tension between memory and reality. It avoids the typical clichés of the homecoming genre, offering a nuanced deconstruction of heritage. The film's strength lies in its cultural immersion and critique of how modern progress erases rural identities. By centering a female protagonist in a South American setting, it challenges Western-centric storytelling norms. While the film provides a sophisticated look at matriarchal lineage and cultural shock, it lacks specific evidence regarding LGBTQ+ identities or explicit depictions of disability.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Roads in February have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film focuses on familial lineage and generational disconnect without depicting LGBTQ+ identities or relationships that assume everyone is straight.

How does Roads in February portray gender?

Good

The film centers on the relationship between Sarah and her grandmother, emphasizing women's ability to drive the story and interiority over traditional male-dominated narratives.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Roads in February?

Good

Set in a rural Uruguayan village, the film critiques how globalized progress often sidelines non-Western, peripheral communities.

How does Roads in February represent religion and culture?

Good

The story explores the tension between localized traditions and modern advancement, avoiding the glorification of Westernized stability and focusing on the realities of a forgotten village.

Does Roads in February include disability representation?

Fair

The film touches upon the vulnerability of an aging population but does not clearly depict characters with specific disabilities or neurodivergence with high ability to act.

Present on Screen

  • Strong focus on women's ability to drive the story and matriarchal emotional frameworks.
  • Effective use of a non-Western setting to challenge Anglo-centric perspectives.
  • Nuanced critique of modernity and systemic neglect of rural communities.

Limited or Absent

  • Lack of explicit representation regarding LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Unclear depiction of specific disabilities or neurodivergent characters.
  • Limited exploration of diverse identities beyond the central female protagonist.

Official Synopsis

Driven by childhood memories and the hope of a reencounter, Sarah visits her paternal grandmother in her village in Uruguay. She takes long to understand the prevailing unease… But she is soon faced with the gap between her fantasy regarding the place of origin and that village of old people forgotten by Modernity where the heat is overwhelming and the days seem to last forever. Cultural shock, humor, tenderness and sadness give shape to this bitter-sweet film.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.