The Aftermath
2019
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Their Finest
2017
RDirector
Lone Scherfig
Runtime
117 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
During the Blitz of World War II, a female screenwriter works on a film celebrating England's resilience as a way to buoy a weary populace's spirits. Her efforts to dramatise the true story of two sisters who undertook their own maritime mission to rescue wounded soldiers are met with mixed feelings by a dismissive all-male staff.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.8/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a heteronormative wartime framework. It focuses on romantic and professional tensions without providing explicit evidence of non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The narrative centers on female agency, highlighting a screenwriter and a radio operator. It effectively subverts tropes by showcasing women navigating professional spheres and resisting all-male hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film reflects the historical homogeneity of 1940s British institutions. It lacks a multi-ethnic cast, adhering to the visual realities of the era's social structures.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story explores the tension between objective truth and state propaganda. It critiques the ethics of using constructed narratives to bolster national morale during wartime.
Disability Representation
There is no prominent or central depiction of visible or invisible disabilities driving the narrative arc.
Strengths
- Subverts traditional wartime tropes by centering female agency in professional roles.
- Provides a nuanced look at gendered power dynamics and systemic resistance to women.
- Offers a sophisticated critique of state propaganda and the ethics of manufactured truth.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting a very narrow historical lens.
- Provides minimal representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
- Does not include depictions of disability within the central character arcs.
AI Analysis
Lone Scherfig’s drama succeeds in elevating female intellectual authority within a male-dominated professional landscape. By centering on a female screenwriter, the film challenges traditional wartime roles and explores the friction between individual truth and institutional mandates. However, the film remains tethered to the social constraints of its period. It lacks racial and LGBTQ+ diversity, reflecting the historical homogeneity of 1940s Britain rather than expanding the narrative's demographic scope. Ultimately, the work is a sophisticated critique of institutional messaging. It prioritizes gendered subversion and ethical complexity over broader representation of marginalized identities.
Similar Movies
Suite Française
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
Captain Corelli's Mandolin
2001
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.5 out of 10
The Ottoman Lieutenant
2017
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Where Hands Touch
2018
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 7.3 out of 10
Waterloo Bridge
1940
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Mrs. Miniver
1942
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
Charlotte Gray
2001
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Shining Through
1992
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Pearl Harbor
2001
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.5 out of 10
A Private War
2018
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.9 out of 10
Allied
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.