You are here:

Long Distance

Long Distance

Representation Score

2.8/10

Limited

2005

R

Director

Marcus Stern

Runtime

92 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Long Distance is a conventional mid-2000s thriller that prioritizes suspense and individual survival over exploring complex identities. The film relies heavily on established genre clichés, particularly the predator-versus-victim dynamic, limiting its capacity for social subversion. The narrative structure does not intentionally address overlapping identities. It functions as a standard horror piece where the focus remains on the immediate threat rather than diverse cultural or social perspectives. Ultimately, the film adheres to traditional cinematic conventions and offers little disruption of social norms or nuanced character studies beyond the central survival struggle.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Long Distance have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any visible LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisgender identities. The story revolves around a single protagonist and a villainous antagonist.

How does Long Distance portray gender?

Fair

The story uses the traditional 'final girl' cliché common in horror. While the female protagonist drives the survival plot, this dynamic reinforces conventional gender power imbalances.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Long Distance?

Limited

There is no evidence of a diverse cast or non-Anglo-Saxon majority. The film seems to follow standard, homogeneous genre conventions.

How does Long Distance represent religion and culture?

Limited

The narrative centers on a localized conflict rather than systemic critique. It lacks themes that challenge traditional institutions or social hierarchies.

Does Long Distance include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence suggesting the inclusion of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • The female protagonist drives the survival plot.

Limited or Absent

  • The film relies on the 'final girl' cliché, reinforcing traditional gender power imbalances.
  • There is a lack of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisgender identities.
  • The narrative lacks racial diversity and follows homogeneous casting conventions.
  • The story fails to engage with systemic critiques or diverse cultural themes.

Official Synopsis

A young woman accidentally dials the number of a serial killer who decides to make her his next victim.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.