You are here:
Simon Says Goodbye to His Foreskin

Simon Says Goodbye to His Foreskin

2015

Director

Viviane Andereggen

Runtime

81 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Simon Grünberg (12) never cared for his Jewish heritage, while his divorced parents bicker whether he should to his bar mithzva as father Frank wants, or save his foreskin as mother Hannah holds. When he falls in love at first sight of the new 'rabbi' Rebecca, Ben decides to join the preparatory religious class hoping to win her.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.1/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex intimacy. The plot focuses on a young boy's romantic interest in a female figure, though it emphasizes individual desire over communal expectations.

Gender Representation

Good

The story disrupts traditional hierarchies by centering maternal agency. Hannah challenges paternal authority by advocating for her son's bodily autonomy, providing a nuanced look at maternal influence.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The narrative engages with Jewish identity through personal negotiation rather than monolithic tradition. It avoids essentialist depictions by portraying the protagonist as someone disconnected from his religious heritage.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film deconstructs religious institutions by prioritizing individual agency over adherence. It uses the role of the Rabbi as a romantic catalyst to challenge traditional sanctity and institutional authority.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed that impact the narrative arc.

Strengths

  • Strong deconstruction of traditional religious institutions and their absolute moral authority.
  • Nuanced exploration of maternal agency and bodily sovereignty against paternal lawgiving.
  • Avoids ethnic essentialism by focusing on individualized, secularized experiences of Jewish identity.

Areas for Improvement

  • Complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or same-sex intimacy within the narrative.
  • No visible or invisible disabilities are integrated into the story's arc.
  • The romantic focus is limited to a traditional heterosexual interest.

AI Analysis

The film succeeds by centering the conflict on individual autonomy and the deconstruction of religious tradition. It moves away from monolithic ethnic portrayals, instead focusing on a secularized, personal experience of identity. While the narrative offers a sophisticated critique of familial and religious structures, it lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and disabilities. The focus remains strictly on the protagonist's negotiation of his heritage and bodily sovereignty. Ultimately, the work functions as a study of situational ethics, using a comedic framework to explore how personal desire can clash with long-standing communal customs.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.