You are here:

Floating Things

Name: Floating Things
Director: Mircea Daneliuc
Released: 2009
Duration: 89 min

Representation Score

4.9/10

Fair

2009

Director

Mircea Daneliuc

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Mircea Daneliuc’s drama excels in its gritty, realist exploration of geopolitical tensions and migration. By focusing on the exploitation of xenophobia, the film offers a sophisticated critique of Western capitalist-driven exclusion and the migrant experience. However, the film struggles with limited ability to act for female characters and lacks representation for LGBTQ+ and disabled communities. The narrative architecture prioritizes the male protagonist's moral decay, often relegating female characters to roles that serve his personal development rather than their own autonomy.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Floating Things have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story centers on traditional, yet dysfunctional, family and social structures.

How does Floating Things portray gender?

Fair

The narrative deconstructs patriarchal family units through moral transgressions such as an affair with a daughter-in-law. Female characters primarily serve as catalysts for the male protagonist's crisis.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Floating Things?

Good

The film offers a high degree of awareness regarding migration and ethnic tension. It uses an immigrant camp to explore the friction between different ethnic and social classes.

How does Floating Things represent religion and culture?

Good

The story provides a cynical critique of Western socioeconomic structures and xenophobia. It explores systemic harm and the corruption of traditional social boundaries through its setting.

Does Floating Things include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence regarding the inclusion or portrayal of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Present on Screen

Nuanced exploration of ethnic tension and the migrant experience.
Sophisticated critique of Western European socioeconomic structures and xenophobia.
Effective use of setting to mirror broader geopolitical conflicts.

Limited or Absent

Limited ability to act for female characters within the narrative.
Lack of representation for LGBTQ+ identities.
Absence of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

While working in Europe, Avram comes to realize that Italians are paying good money for trained dogs that can protect them from the waves of immigrants. That's Avram's big-time idea: he returns to Romania to start breeding watch dogs which he can later export to Italy. As it happens, he settles next to a camp of immigrants recently sent back from Rome. Thus, the Italian tension is willy-nilly reenacted on the banks of the Danube. Avram's life gets complicated. He starts having an affair with his own daughter in law, lands in conflict with his ex-immigrant neighbors and his life is literally under threat. The film ends with an unpredictable situation.

How are these scores produced? →