You are here:
The Kirishima Thing

The Kirishima Thing

2012

Director

Daihachi Yoshida

Runtime

103 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A story about the disappearance of Kirishima, a star athlete of the volleyball club, and how his disappearance affects every person in school.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.9/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film operates within heteronormative social structures. While it explores intense emotional bonds between male peers, it lacks explicit depictions of non-cisnormative identities or queer perspectives.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative centers on male-dominated hierarchies and masculine peer dynamics. It deconstructs the myth of the dominant male figure but does not explicitly center female agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is ethnically homogeneous, reflecting the specific demographic reality of a Japanese high school. The film lacks intersectional racial complexity or diverse ethnic backgrounds.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film critiques institutional cohesion and social policing within a school microcosm. It portrays student reputations and social masks as inherently deceptive and dysfunctional.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no significant depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The story focuses on psychological and social stressors rather than disability as a narrative driver.

Strengths

  • Sophisticated deconstruction of social hierarchies and institutional pressure.
  • Nuanced critique of the performative nature of identity and social masks.
  • Effective portrayal of the psychological impact of social stratification.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative narratives.
  • Minimal focus on female agency or subverting gender hierarchies.
  • Absence of racial, ethnic, or disability-based intersectional complexity.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a sophisticated deconstruction of social architecture. It uses a fragmented structure to examine how a central figure's absence disrupts high school hierarchies and psychological stability. While the film offers a nuanced critique of performative identity and systemic pressure, it lacks demographic breadth. It prioritizes thematic depth over intersectional representation across most categories. Ultimately, the work finds its value in challenging the perceived stability of social institutions rather than providing a diverse cast of characters.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.