You are here:

The Frog, the Dog, and the Devil

Name: The Frog, the Dog, and the Devil
Director: Bob Stenhouse
Released: 1986
Duration: 8 min

Representation Score

4.3/10

Fair

1986

Director

Bob Stenhouse

Runtime

8 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film serves as a character-driven psychological study rather than a work of social commentary. It uses a dark, personified struggle with addiction to drive a madcap Western animation. While the narrative explores moral complexity through a personified Devil, it relies heavily on traditional clichés. The focus remains on individual psychological chaos rather than diverse social frameworks. Ultimately, the work prioritizes comedic energy and character archetypes over disrupting social hierarchies or representing underrepresented identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Frog, the Dog, and the Devil have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on a single protagonist struggling with addiction. There are no queer-coded storylines or characters with non-straight identities.

How does The Frog, the Dog, and the Devil portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on a drunkard, a role traditionally associated with masculinity. It does not challenge gender hierarchies or present non-traditional dynamics.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Frog, the Dog, and the Devil?

Minimal

There is no information about the racial or ethnic makeup of the characters. The Western setting does not confirm any diversity among the cast.

How does The Frog, the Dog, and the Devil represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film uses dark humor to address the stigma of alcohol withdrawal. It personifies this struggle through a Devil figure to explore psychological morality.

Does The Frog, the Dog, and the Devil include disability representation?

Fair

Substance dependency is a central theme, possibly reflecting chronic health issues. However, the comedic tone might prioritize slapstick over nuanced portrayals of addiction.

Present on Screen

The film provides a unique, subjective look at morality by personifying the psychological struggle of addiction.
It effectively uses dark comedy to handle a heavy, stigmatized subject.

Limited or Absent

The narrative lacks engagement with diverse racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ identities.
The comedic portrayal of withdrawal risks oversimplifying a serious health issue.
The film relies on traditional male clichés without challenging established gender hierarchies.

Official Synopsis

The short tells the story of a drunkard going through alcohol withdrawal, as personified by the Devil. Director Bob Stenhouse takes what could be a dark subject and makes it a funny madcap romp.

How are these scores produced? →