
Tu£sday
2008

1980
Director
Boris Grigorev
Runtime
83 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Employees of the Moscow Criminal Investigation Department - Colonel Alexei Pavlovich Sadchikov, Major Vladislav Nikolaevich Kostenko and Senior Lieutenant Valentin Roslyakov are investigating the impudent robberies carried out by a group wearing dark glasses criminals. The City Savings Bank was robbed. The investigation of the crime indicated the involvement of a teenager, who soon came to the criminal investigation himself. With his help, the robbers who were preparing the next raid were caught. But the most dangerous criminal — "Prokhor" — is still free...
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres to the social norms of its era. There are no depictions of non-cisnormative gender identities or narratives that challenge heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
The plot is driven by male protagonists in the criminal investigation. Women are largely relegated to domestic or supportive roles, reinforcing traditional gendered divisions of authority.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The ensemble reflects the multi-ethnic composition of the Soviet Union, including Slavic and potentially Central Asian ethnicities. This mirrors the demographic reality of the period.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative is deeply embedded in the Soviet institutional framework. It emphasizes social cohesion and the efficacy of state law rather than exploring diverse cultural or religious perspectives.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible focus on visible or invisible disabilities. Characters are defined primarily by their professional utility or social roles within the investigation.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Petrovka Street, Number 38 is a product of Soviet Social Realism, prioritizing the maintenance of social order and civic duty. The narrative structure is designed to reinforce existing institutional hierarchies rather than deconstruct them. Representation is limited by the film's historical context. The focus remains on male-led state institutions, which results in a lack of diverse gender dynamics and identity-based narratives. While the cast reflects the multi-ethnic reality of the Soviet Union, the film functions as a study of institutional stability. It lacks the intentionality required to challenge traditional power dynamics or promote modern intersectional representation.

2008

1986

1944

2021

1979

1956

1977

2005

2022

1984

1963

2004
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.