Tom and Jerry & The Wizard of Oz
2011
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Tom and Jerry: Robin Hood and His Merry Mouse
2012
TV-GDirector
Spike Brandt, Tony Cervone
Runtime
55 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Robin Hood steals from the rich and give to the poor, and needs the help of Tom and Jerry! Your favorite daring duo aims to beloved medieval tale in a new film is all for one and one for all!
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
5.0/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film contains no LGBTQ+ characters or explorations of non-heteronormative identities. Character dynamics focus strictly on traditional slapstick archetypes and physical conflict.
Gender Representation
The cast is primarily male-coded, adhering to conventional comedic archetypes. The narrative lacks subversion of gender hierarchies or nuanced exploration of female agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
As an anthropomorphic animation, the film lacks human racial or ethnic representation. The cast remains homogeneous and driven by classic fable archetypes.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story centers on a critique of power structures and systemic inequality. It uses the Robin Hood mythos to champion the redistribution of wealth.
Disability Representation
No characters with visible or invisible disabilities are portrayed with agency. Physical injury is used primarily as a comedic device for slapstick violence.
Strengths
- The narrative provides a strong critique of corrupt institutional authority and systemic inequality.
- The story promotes a progressive moral framework centered on the redistribution of resources to the impoverished.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks meaningful representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative characters.
- There is a significant absence of diverse gender roles and female agency within the cast.
- The use of physical injury as a comedic device fails to provide meaningful disability representation.
AI Analysis
The film relies heavily on established slapstick tropes and the classic Robin Hood mythos, which limits its capacity for diverse character representation. While the narrative succeeds in critiquing socioeconomic inequality and corrupt authority, it does so through a narrow lens of traditional archetypes. Gender and racial diversity are minimal due to the anthropomorphic nature of the cast and a focus on male-coded protagonists. The lack of meaningful representation for LGBTQ+ identities and individuals with disabilities further restricts the film's inclusive depth. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its thematic focus on social justice and wealth redistribution rather than its character-driven diversity.
Similar Movies
Garfield's Feline Fantasies
1990
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
Tom and Jerry: The Lost Dragon
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Tom and Jerry: Back to Oz
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
Tom and Jerry's Giant Adventure
2013
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
Tom and Jerry: A Nutcracker Tale
2007
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.