
The Sword in the Stone
1963

1973
GDirector
Wolfgang Reitherman
Runtime
83 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
With King Richard off to the Crusades, Prince John and his slithering minion, Sir Hiss, set about taxing Nottingham's citizens with support from the corrupt sheriff - and staunch opposition by the wily Robin Hood and his band of merry men.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. The romantic arc follows a traditional pairing between Robin Hood and Maid Marian.
Gender Representation
Maid Marian possesses significant autonomy and intellectual engagement, avoiding the standard damsel trope. However, the cast remains male-dominated and maintains conventional gendered leadership roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
As an anthropomorphic feature, human racial diversity is absent. Instead, species serve as a semiotic proxy for social class and power dynamics within the narrative.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story offers a progressive critique of Western institutional structures. It frames wealth redistribution as a moral necessity against systemic oppression and corrupt state authority.
Disability Representation
The film provides no substantive depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. Characters are defined by their species and social standing.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Robin Hood (1973) uses anthropomorphic archetypes to explore systemic inequality and the corruption of power. While it lacks human-centric intersectional representation, it succeeds in deconstructing class hierarchies through its narrative structure. The film's strength lies in its anti-aristocratic themes and the agency granted to female characters like Maid Marian. It reframes vigilantism as a tool for social justice against predatory institutions. However, the absence of LGBTQ+ identities and physical disability representation limits its breadth. The reliance on species as a proxy for social status replaces traditional racial and ethnic diversity.

1963

2010

2004

1977

2005

1967

1970

1992

1996

2008

1996

1995
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.