You are here:
Rats

Rats

2016

Not Rated

Director

Morgan Spurlock

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Based on Robert Sullivan’s bestselling book, Morgan Spurlock and his team travel around the world to bring viewers face to face with rats while delving into humans’ complicated relationship with the creepy creatures.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.8/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The documentary lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It focuses on biological and urban ecological studies rather than identity-based social narratives.

Gender Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of gendered power dynamics or the subversion of gender hierarchies. The film prioritizes historical and biological inquiry regarding urban fauna.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The global travelogue implies diverse geographic settings, but the narrative does not explicitly center on specific ethnic groups. It functions primarily as a sociological survey.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film examines the complicated relationship between humans and urban ecosystems. It touches on how civilization manages waste, food systems, and resource management.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no characters or narratives centered on physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The subject matter remains strictly focused on the interaction between humans and rats.

Strengths

  • The global travelogue format provides a broad geographic scope that touches on various international urban environments.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities, gendered power dynamics, or disability-centered narratives.
  • The narrative does not explicitly center on intersectional racial identities or the agency of specific ethnic groups.

AI Analysis

Morgan Spurlock’s documentary is a specialized study of urban ecology and human-animal interaction. Because the narrative is built around biological and historical inquiry, it lacks the social identity components necessary for high intersectional representation. The film operates within a traditional scientific and observational framework. It does not intentionally subvert social hierarchies or explore human interpersonal dynamics, which limits its diversity impact. While the global scope suggests a wide reach, the focus remains on the biological subject rather than the diverse human identities inhabiting those spaces.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.