
How to Deal
2003

2012
PG-13Director
Lisa Azuelos
Runtime
97 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In a world connected by YouTube, iTunes, and Facebook, Lola and her friends navigate the peer pressures of high school romance and friendship while dodging their sometimes overbearing and confused parents. When Lola's mom, Anne, "accidentally" reads her teenage daughter's racy journal, she realizes just how wide their communication gap has grown.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The story focuses almost exclusively on heteronormative romance and conventional teenage attractions. It lacks any significant presence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that challenge traditional social structures.
Gender Representation
The film centers on female agency and emotional intelligence, allowing women to drive the social and emotional momentum. This shift prioritizes female perspectives over typical male-driven action tropes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting depicts a relatively homogeneous, white, middle-to-upper-class French social circle. It lacks a multicultural tapestry, opting instead for a localized and demographic-specific lens.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative explores the widening communication gap between generations and the erosion of parental authority. However, it avoids broader critiques of religion or capitalism, staying within commercial drama bounds.
Disability Representation
There are no prominent depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities that serve as central drivers for the characters or the plot.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
LOL is a character study of adolescent social dynamics in a digital-centric Parisian landscape. It succeeds in centering female agency, providing a meaningful shift in perspective by making women the primary drivers of the film's emotional momentum. However, the film remains quite conventional. The lack of racial and LGBTQ+ diversity keeps the narrative within a narrow, homogeneous social milieu. It functions more as a localized portrait of a specific class than a diverse or intersectional exploration. Ultimately, the film prioritizes emotional realism and teenage peer groups over systemic disruption. While it offers a strong female-centric viewpoint, it lacks the breadth to be considered a progressive representation of modern society.

2003

2014

2018

2014

2012

2013

2011

2008

2018

2010

2007

2007
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.