You are here:
Things I Like, Things I Don't Like

Things I Like, Things I Don't Like

1990

Director

Jean-Pierre Jeunet

Runtime

8 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Dominique Pinon takes the viewer through various examples of what he "likes and dislikes."

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film's structure centers on subjective preference, which allows for non-traditional tastes. However, there is no explicit evidence of queer characters or specific non-heteronormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The focus on internal preferences provides a platform to subvert social expectations. Detailed character arcs or gendered interactions are not present to confirm the subversion of hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The film appears to be a localized, character-driven comedy. There is no evidence of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast within the available data.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

By prioritizing personal whims over social instruction, the film disrupts singular cultural standards. This emphasis on personal truth aligns with a postmodern, relativistic approach to storytelling.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film provides no information regarding the portrayal of physical disabilities or neurodivergence.

Strengths

  • The film's structure prioritizes individual subjectivity over established social or moral hierarchies.
  • Jeunet's idiosyncratic style supports a narrative that challenges conventional, prescriptive modes of viewing the world.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks explicit intersectional complexity and specific evidence of diverse character identities.
  • There is no visible representation of neurodivergence or physical disabilities.

AI Analysis

Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s work often centers eccentric perspectives, and this short film follows that trend by focusing on the subjective whims of Dominique Pinon. The narrative architecture is built around individual taste rather than traditional social norms. While the film challenges prescriptive ways of viewing the world through its focus on personal preference, it lacks explicit intersectional complexity. It functions more as a study of subjectivity than a diverse social commentary. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its deconstruction of objective standards, even if it does not provide specific evidence of diverse casting or representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.