Pride & Prejudice
2005
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Far from the Madding Crowd
2015
PG-13Director
Thomas Vinterberg
Runtime
119 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In Victorian England, the independent and headstrong Bathsheba Everdene attracts three very different suitors: Gabriel Oak, a hardworking young sheep farmer; Frank Troy, a handsome and reckless Sergeant; and William Boldwood, a prosperous and mature bachelor.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.9/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses entirely on heteronormative romantic entanglements. There is no visible presence of queer subtext or non-cisnormative identities within this Victorian setting.
Gender Representation
Bathsheba Everdene disrupts 19th-century hierarchies as a decisive female landowner. Her agency and authority over her suitors subvert the typical trope of the submissive Victorian heroine.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast is predominantly homogeneous, reflecting the localized Anglo-Saxon agrarian society of the era. There is a lack of significant racial blending or non-white representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story explores Western class hierarchies and agrarian capitalism. It uses moral complexity and situational ethics to challenge rigid, singular morality through its characters.
Disability Representation
The primary character arcs do not include depictions of visible or invisible disabilities. There is no focus on neurodivergence or chronic illness.
Strengths
- Strong female agency through Bathsheba Everdene's role as a landowner.
- Effective subversion of traditional 19th-century gender hierarchies.
- Nuanced exploration of moral complexity and situational ethics.
Areas for Improvement
- Lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast.
- Absence of LGBTQ+ representation or queer subtext.
- No depiction of disability or neurodivergence.
AI Analysis
Thomas Vinterberg’s adaptation is a study of individual autonomy clashing with rigid historical structures. The film's strength lies in its subversion of gendered power dynamics, placing a woman in a position of significant economic and social authority. However, the narrative is limited by its historical setting, resulting in a lack of racial, LGBTQ+, and disability representation. This creates a bifurcated viewing experience where gender progressiveness exists alongside a lack of broader intersectional inclusion. Ultimately, the film prioritizes the deconstruction of patriarchal estate management over a diverse social spectrum, making it a focused character study rather than a broad social tapestry.
Featured in
Similar Movies
Becoming Jane
2007
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
Sense and Sensibility
1995
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
The Souvenir
2019
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
Of Human Bondage
1934
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Persuasion
1995
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Anna Karenina
2012
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
45 Years
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
Before Sunset
2004
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
The Bridges of Madison County
1995
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.5 out of 10
Before Midnight
2013
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
Wild Mountain Thyme
2020
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.