
Love in the Time of Money
2002

2006
RDirector
Michael Caleo
Runtime
96 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Ted Ryker is the top salesman in the New York office of a business machine company; the corporate stock lives by quarterly sales numbers, the competition is keen, and the economy may be in a downturn. Ted's company is marking time until a new product is ready – probably in a few months. Into the mix comes a new hire, a callow Midwesterner named Jamie, who's come East with his fiancée Belisa.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The central romantic tension follows a traditional heteronormative structure between Jamie and Belisa.
Gender Representation
The narrative focuses heavily on the professional trajectory of Ted Ryker. Belisa is introduced primarily through her relationship to Jamie, adhering to traditional romantic tropes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story utilizes conventional Western professional archetypes within a New York corporate setting. There is no indication of a non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film operates within a standard capitalist framework centered on corporate competition. It lacks an explicit critique of Western institutions or social structures.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The character descriptions provide no evidence of neurodivergent representation.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Last Time functions as a conventional character study set within a traditional corporate and social framework. The narrative relies on established dramatic structures, focusing on professional competence and standard romantic milestones rather than challenging social hierarchies. While the film establishes a clear setting in a New York business environment, it lacks intersectional depth. The characters appear to inhabit roles that reinforce traditional Western archetypes without subverting them. Ultimately, the production lacks significant representation across most diversity metrics, prioritizing a standard professional drama over progressive or diverse storytelling.

2002

1959

2008

1998

2013

2017

1976

2015

1999

1999

2001

2006
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.