You are here:

Kim Philby: His Most Intimate Betrayal

No Poster Available

Representation Score

1.2/10

Minimal

2014

Director

Francis Whately

Runtime

120 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This documentary prioritizes historical and ideological inquiry over demographic representation. It adheres strictly to the historical realities of the 20th-century British intelligence community, which lacked diverse identities. While the film lacks social diversity, it disrupts the 'spy thriller' genre by refusing to frame Philby as a simple hero or villain. Instead, it examines the breakdown of social trust. The narrative's strength lies in its critique of Western institutionalism and how individual ideological conviction can challenge systemic power structures.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Kim Philby: His Most Intimate Betrayal have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The documentary focuses on geopolitical and intelligence-based motivations. There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-straight identities.

How does Kim Philby: His Most Intimate Betrayal portray gender?

Limited

The narrative centers on male-dominated spheres of mid-20th-century British intelligence. It lacks significant roles for women in driving the story and challenges traditional gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Kim Philby: His Most Intimate Betrayal?

Minimal

The film depicts a largely homogeneous Anglo-Saxon environment consistent with the historical context. It does not utilize diverse character arcs to challenge era-specific demographic norms.

How does Kim Philby: His Most Intimate Betrayal represent religion and culture?

Good

The film provides a platform for anti-capitalist perspectives by exploring Philby’s communist ideology. It critiques the perceived failures and corruption of the British establishment.

Does Kim Philby: His Most Intimate Betrayal include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on physical or neurodivergent representation. No characters are portrayed through the lens of disability.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a nuanced critique of Western institutionalism and state loyalty.
  • Deconstructs the romanticized 'gentleman spy' archetype through a modern lens.
  • Explores complex ideological struggles and the breakdown of social trust.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks significant roles for women in driving the story.
  • Depicts a largely homogeneous Anglo-Saxon environment with minimal racial diversity.
  • Offers no representation of disability or neurodivergent perspectives.

Official Synopsis

Author Ben Macintyre explores the truth behind one of the most famous double agents in modern history - Harold Kim Philby. He argues that Philby has become a caricature of the gentleman spy, obscuring the fact that Philby was a ruthless killer, who betrayed everyone around him. The key to Philby's success and his survival, Macintyre explains, lay in his friendship with a man that history has largely forgotten - Nicholas Elliott. Elliott was Philby's colleague in MI6 who befriended him, defended him, and unwittingly supplied him with secrets until he discovered the truth. This is the remarkable tale of two friends and two spies, each working on opposite sides in the Cold War.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.