You are here:
Empeliculados

Empeliculados

2017

Director

Diego F. Bustamante

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Jorge, a dreamy movie director with no money and Andrés a wanna be actor, have been trying to make their first movie for years. When the investor who was going to put money to make the film turns out to be a swindler, Jorge and Andres decide to hide the truth from their project partners. Both will end up embarking on a series of crazy occurrences to get the money and sustain their lie.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.9/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities. The story focuses entirely on the central duo's professional and financial struggles.

Gender Representation

Fair

The plot is driven by male protagonists, Jorge and Andrés. While it avoids reinforcing harmful hierarchies, it lacks female characters with significant agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Representation remains neutral without specific casting details. The film follows a standard character-driven comedy format without explicit evidence of intersectional casting strategies.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative functions as a localized comedy of errors. It does not prioritize anti-capitalist frameworks or secularism as primary narrative drivers.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the film's context.

Strengths

  • The film provides a focused character study of ambition and the lengths individuals go to maintain professional facades.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks female characters with high agency or the subversion of traditional gender roles.
  • There is a notable absence of LGBTQ+ representation and characters with disabilities.
  • The film misses opportunities to engage with intersectional casting or broader systemic social critiques.

AI Analysis

Empeliculados is a conventional comedy centered on the personal ambitions and deceptions of two men in the film industry. The narrative prioritizes situational irony and individual struggle over systemic social critique. The film lacks intentional intersectional representation, focusing instead on a traditional comedic structure. It does not actively challenge established social norms or prioritize demographic subversion. Because the story revolves around a specific professional predicament, it misses opportunities to explore broader identity-based frameworks or diverse social perspectives.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.