
The Student
2015

2016
UnratedDirector
Kirill Serebrennikov
Runtime
118 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A high school student becomes convinced that the world is lost to evil and begins to challenge the morals and beliefs of the adults surrounding him.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The protagonist's rigid religious fundamentalism creates an environment where non-normative identities are implicitly marginalized through scrutiny.
Gender Representation
Characters largely operate within traditional social roles. While the protagonist disrupts the gymnasium's social structures, the film does not prioritize the deconstruction of masculinity or femininity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast is relatively homogeneous, reflecting a specific Russian cultural and educational setting. The narrative focuses on internal ideological tensions rather than intersectional racial complexities.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
Serebrennikov offers a sophisticated critique of secular institutions through the lens of religious dogma. The film effectively explores the friction between fundamentalism and modern social norms.
Disability Representation
There is no significant portrayal of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The narrative focus remains strictly on ideological and social conflicts.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Student is a sharp, ideologically driven drama that prioritizes the clash between religious dogma and secular authority over demographic breadth. Its strength lies in its cultural critique, using a fundamentalist student to challenge the stability of modern social contracts and state-run educational systems. However, the film lacks meaningful representation across most identity categories. The cast is culturally homogeneous, and there is a notable absence of LGBTQ+ characters, neurodivergent individuals, or characters with disabilities. The narrative's narrow focus on ideological warfare leaves little room for intersectional exploration. Ultimately, the film is a specialized study of institutional fragility. It succeeds as a critique of traditionalism but fails to provide a diverse spectrum of human experience beyond its central religious conflict.

2015

1981

2009

2010

2007

1988

1977

2011

2015

2021

2018

2017
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.