You are here:

Thunder

Thunder

Representation Score

4.7/10

Fair

1982

Director

Takashi Ito

Runtime

5 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Thunder is an experimental animated film that focuses on sensory exploration rather than traditional character-driven narratives. Its strength lies in its non-Western perspective and its ability to challenge conventional cinematic structures through avant-garde techniques. Because the film relies on abstract imagery and long-exposure photography, it lacks the interpersonal depth needed to address identity or social structures directly. The representation of gender and culture is conveyed through form and origin rather than through explicit character actions. Ultimately, the film functions as a psychological exploration, offering a non-linear alternative to Anglo-Saxon narrative dominance but remaining silent on specific multi-layered identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Thunder have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not provide any direct evidence of LGBTQ characters or relationships. A woman's face is used as a central motif, but there are no clear queer narratives.

How does Thunder portray gender?

Fair

A female face serves as the main visual symbol, challenging traditional gender roles. However, the film's subversion of these roles remains mostly aesthetic due to a lack of interpersonal dynamics.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Thunder?

Fair

As a Japanese production, the film offers a unique perspective that counters Western-centric cinema. Its abstract nature makes it difficult to analyze a diverse cast in detail.

How does Thunder represent religion and culture?

Good

The film rejects traditional Western storytelling in favor of ghostly, subjective imagery. This approach challenges the ordered reality often promoted by mainstream commercial cinema.

Does Thunder include disability representation?

Minimal

Due to its experimental and abstract nature, the film does not provide any clear depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a non-Western perspective by operating outside the Anglo-Saxon cinematic tradition.
  • Challenges traditional cinematic hierarchies by centering a female face as a primary motif.
  • Rejects Western storytelling structures in favor of subjective, atmospheric expression.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit character development to address sexual orientation or gender identity.
  • Does not depict physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Fails to establish systemic subversion of gendered power structures due to its non-narrative format.

Official Synopsis

A woman’s face disappearing behind, and emerging from, a pair of hands. Flashing lights. An empty building full of dark hallways. Designs drawn in the air with light and long-exposure cinematography.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.