You are here:
Beginning

Beginning

1967

Director

Artavazd Peleshian

Runtime

10 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Philosophical essay about the October Revolution of 1917 in Russia, its influence on the destiny of the world in the 20th century.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film functions as a non-narrative montage of observational footage. Because it lacks character arcs or interpersonal dialogue, there is no evidence of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.

Gender Representation

Limited

Gender representation is incidental rather than intentional. The absence of a traditional plot prevents the subversion of gender roles or the establishment of specific gendered agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The visual palette reflects the multi-ethnic landscape of the USSR. However, the film presents a broad humanistic view without centering specific ethnic identities or addressing racial hierarchies.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The work engages with anti-capitalist frameworks by focusing on the October Revolution. It prioritizes a systemic view of history that deconstructs traditional Western institutional dominance.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains on historical momentum rather than specific neurodivergent or physical experiences.

Strengths

  • Offers a powerful systemic critique of historical power structures.
  • Provides a broad, humanistic view of the diverse Soviet populace.
  • Challenges Western institutional dominance through an anti-capitalist lens.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks character-driven narratives to explore specific identity-based experiences.
  • Provides no active engagement with gendered power dynamics or agency.
  • Fails to represent specific neurodivergent or physical experiences.

AI Analysis

Artavazd Peleshian’s film is a philosophical essay that prioritizes macro-historical shifts over individual character studies. Its avant-garde, montage-driven structure means it lacks the interpersonal dynamics necessary to score highly in identity-based categories. The work excels in its systemic critique of power. By framing history through the lens of the October Revolution, it offers a perspective that challenges Western institutional dominance and emphasizes collective movement. Ultimately, the film is bifurcated. It is philosophically progressive in its historical framing but lacks the micro-level intersectional character development found in traditional narrative cinema.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.